Supreme Court Rejects Vaccine Lawsuits
The Supreme Court yesterday put a lid on so-called "design defect" lawsuits against vaccine makers. As a result, if you or your child is injured by a vaccine side effect you must look to a special fund for compensation.
- Supreme Court says no to lawsuits for vaccine side effects
- Victims must seek compensation from special vaccine-injury fund
- Design defect lawsuits may improve product safety
- Copy this link to share with friends: http://bit.ly/eIx7HV
Vaccines Inoculated Against Design Defect Claims
In this case an infant received a vaccine for diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus. She developed seizures and remains mentally impaired nearly 20 years later. Her parents wanted compensation from the vaccine maker.
In 1986 Congress set up a special program to compensate victims who claim injury from vaccines. As a trade-off, it banned lawsuits against the vaccine maker for "unavoidable side effects." According to the Court, this includes claims that a vaccine could have been designed more safely to eliminate the side effects.
Defective design is one kind of products liability claim. It holds a manufacturer responsible for trading off safety for profits in designing a product. What the injured party seeks in suing is in a sense part of those profits the manufacturer earned by deciding not to make a more costly, but safer, product.
- Learn more about product liability basics on Lawyers.com
- Find an products liability attorney on Lawyers.com
- Discuss your community issue on our Products Liability Forums
- Lawyers.com Suggested Legal Books
- Did this article help you? If so, please consider sharing it with your friends and encourage them to become a fan of Lawyers.com on Facebook. Or follow us on Twitter to retweet to your friends/followers.
- Download the Lawyers.com app for the iPhone or access the site on your smartphone