U.S. Supreme Court: Oral Arguments on Voting Rights Law

Hillary J. Lovell's Government Legal Blogs

Licensed for 6 years

Attorney in West Columbia, SC

Hillary J. Lovell

Credit cards accepted, Fixed hourly rates

Serving West Columbia, SC

  • Serving West Columbia, SC

  • Credit cards accepted, Fixed hourly rates

Associate at firm Setzler & Scott, P.A.

Serving West Columbia, SC

Credit cards accepted, Fixed hourly rates

The Supreme Court of the United States heard oral arguments yesterday in Shelby County v. Holder (docket number 12-96), a case which challenged the Voting Rights Act of 1965. A copy of the transcript from the argument can be found here.

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 has been credited as one of the most effective civil rights laws in United States history. The question Shelby County raises is whether discrimination is still concentrated in the geographic areas in which the law applies. Specifically, Shelby County asked the Court to strike down Section 5 of the Act as written, which uses a formulation to determine which states the law applies to. Section 5 requires the qualifying states to receive permission prior to changing any voting law. A state may regain control under the current law if the state can prove its election laws were nondiscriminatory for a period of ten years.

For commentary on the argument, see Lyle Denniston’s recap in SCOTUSblog, and his overview of the case. The Court seemed divided at oral arguments, and the outcome will be determined when the Court publishes its opinion.

Setzler & Scott, P.A., is committed to helping the residents of West Columbia, Cayce, Springdale, Lexington, Lexington and Richland Counties, and South Carolina. Our South Carolina Lawyers support their clients and keep them well informed on the status of their cases.

We welcome the opportunity to discuss how we can serve your needs. 

Call 803-728-6126 to discuss a case with Setzler & Scott, P.A.

‹ Blogs Home