FERS & CSRS Disability Retirement from the Office of Personnel Management: The Fallacy of Objective Medical Evidence

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has already addressed the issue of the Office of Personnel Management’s unjustified adherence to making a distinction between "objective medical evidence" as opposed to what they deem and declare to be "subjective" evidence. The distinction has no statutory basis or authority, but OPM continues to make the same, repetitive and tiring arguments concerning such a distinction.  Of course, when there exists a plenitude of "objective" evidence, then OPM will often sidestep such evidence and argue that it wasn’t "compelling" enough.  The fallacy of "objective" versus "subjective" becomes most apparent, of course, when it addresses the issue of "pain".  Pain is by definition a subjective state of experiential encounter.  If there is any "objective" evidence of pain, it is a misunderstanding of what constitutes such evidence.  Thus, for instance, one might point to an MRI showing a multi-level disc degeneration from L3-L4, L4-L5, etc., and state, "There, we have objective evidence of pain."  Not quite.  What you merely have, if one stops and considers it, is simply a parallel set of observable facts:  A:  an image which reveals an abnormality of the spine, combined with B, which has an individual who conveys a sensation of pain.  However, inasmuch as there are many people who have similar or worse states of "A" (multi-level disc degeneration), but go through life without any apparent pain, one cannot therefore argue that A is "objective" evidence of "B".  There may be a parallel correlation to be made, but no causal connection.  Regardless, the Federal Circuit Court has already declared OPM to be in error for making such a distinction.  However, despite the law, OPM continues to deny Federal Disability Retirement applications under FERS & CSRS by adhering to the false distinction.  Imagine that.

Sincerely, Robert R. McGill, Esquire

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has already addressed the issue of the Office of Personnel Management’s unjustified adherence to making a distinction between "objective medical evidence" as opposed to what they deem

View Attorney Profile

Robert R. McGill

Licensed since 1988

Member at firm Robert R. McGill

AWARDS

Champion Badge Platinum

RECENT POSTS

  • FERS OPM Disability Retirement: Similar Lives
    Posted on October 16, 2019
    Topic: Administrative Law

        Dissimilarity is what threatens us; similarity — the notion that there are shared, common characteristics between you and I — provides for an acceptable level of comfort and security. When we learn about the lives of the “rich and famous”, other than feeling some sense of envy, we can still imagine enough similarity ... Read more

  • FERS OPM Disability Retirement: The Albatross
    Posted on October 15, 2019
    Topic: Administrative Law

         The reference is likely outdated. One doesn’t hear of the phrase, anymore, that “X is like an albatross around my neck.” If it is referenced at all, one is likely to witness everyone standing around within earshot to whip out their smartphones and Google it, to find: Literally a large sea bird. The ... Read more

  • FERS OPM Disability Retirement: What we Seek
    Posted on October 14, 2019
    Topic: Administrative Law

         Can everyone’s desire be placed under a single rubric, a single conceptual umbrella which captures the essence of human want? Is it happiness we all seek? A sense of security, or perhaps of joy, contentment, peace or love? And if we were to all agree concerning the single most important goal for which ... Read more

Robert R. McGill

Licensed since 1988

Member at firm Robert R. McGill

AWARDS

Champion Badge Platinum

RECENT POSTS

  • FERS OPM Disability Retirement: Similar Lives
    Posted on October 16, 2019
    Topic: Administrative Law

        Dissimilarity is what threatens us; similarity — the notion that there are shared, common characteristics between you and I — provides for an acceptable level of comfort and security. When we learn about the lives of the “rich and famous”, other than feeling some sense of envy, we can still imagine enough similarity ... Read more

  • FERS OPM Disability Retirement: The Albatross
    Posted on October 15, 2019
    Topic: Administrative Law

         The reference is likely outdated. One doesn’t hear of the phrase, anymore, that “X is like an albatross around my neck.” If it is referenced at all, one is likely to witness everyone standing around within earshot to whip out their smartphones and Google it, to find: Literally a large sea bird. The ... Read more

  • FERS OPM Disability Retirement: What we Seek
    Posted on October 14, 2019
    Topic: Administrative Law

         Can everyone’s desire be placed under a single rubric, a single conceptual umbrella which captures the essence of human want? Is it happiness we all seek? A sense of security, or perhaps of joy, contentment, peace or love? And if we were to all agree concerning the single most important goal for which ... Read more