FERS & CSRS Disability Retirement from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management: Necessary Connections - Administrative Law Legal Blogs Posted by Robert R. McGill - Lawyers.com

FERS & CSRS Disability Retirement from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management: Necessary Connections

Necessity is determined by how one defines and confines the parameters required to reach the requisite conclusion; if the criteria governing the roadmap to a successful outcome is replete with heightened qualitative specifications, greater care and effort may be mandated; conversely, if a looser, more informal measure is imposed, the tendency is to respond accordingly. But what determines the response — outside influences, or one’s own standard of excellence? In Hume’s argument concerning causality, of course, the prerequisites defined were instituted at the outset to defeat the argument for causality; by setting up the requirement of what constitutes a "necessary connection" in order to establish a causal connection, he allowed for no amount of evidence which would satisfy his rule; thus, it was already a self-contained tautology from the outset. For preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits, whether the Federal or Postal employee is under FERS or CSRS, the question becomes: Does the medical condition itself determine the extent of groundwork necessary for a successful approval from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, or should the identical set of stringent prerequisites be satisfied regardless of the seriousness of the medical condition? The obvious answer, of course, should always ascribe to the latter, as acceptance of the former entails potential pitfalls which may result in lost time and unnecessary efforts expended for satisfaction of additional stages in the administrative process. Necessary connections in a Federal Disability Retirement application must be proven and established at all levels; for, as the age-old adage reminds us, it is the weakest link in the chain of arguments which will ultimately defeat the entire structure of an otherwise solid case. It is the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, through statutory impositions and regulatory requirements, which has "pre-set" the necessary connections to be made in proving eligibility for Federal Disability Retirement benefits; it is up to the applicant (you) to make sure that all such causal connections are established, proven, confirmed and supported, in order to ensure the best chances for success in an administrative process fraught with human frailties and foibles.

Sincerely, Robert R. McGill, Esquire

View Attorney Profile

Robert R. McGill

Licensed since 1988

Member at firm Robert R. McGill

AWARDS

Champion Badge Platinum

RECENT POSTS

  • FERS OPM Medical Retirement: Our Collective Responsibilities
    Posted on August 21, 2019

         Is it a redundancy to place “our” before the “collective”? Or, inasmuch as “our” can mean 2 or more individuals together, whereas “collective” might imply a more expansive spectrum of diffuse aggregation, that the second word “adds” something to the first? Do we even have such a thing, and what can it mean ... Read more

  • FERS OPM Medical Retirement: The Lie of Agnosticism
    Posted on August 20, 2019

         Bertrand Russell was famous for it (who would not be — of a tall, slender intellectual with a shock of white hair with that image of a long-stemmed pipe puffing with short bursts of tobacco smoke trailing pervasively behind between haltingly muttered sentences of profound logical confusions?); most of us are lulled into ... Read more

  • FERS OPM Medical Retirement: Deus ex Machina
    Posted on August 19, 2019

    It is a contrivance which finds its origins in Greek plays of a civilization now gone; of the recognition of unsolvable problems created by human hubris; and when all seems lost, the “machina” (machine) which lowers the god (the “Deus”) onto the stage then resolves everything by supernatural means. The contrivance itself would probably not ... Read more

Robert R. McGill

Licensed since 1988

Member at firm Robert R. McGill

AWARDS

Champion Badge Platinum

RECENT POSTS

  • FERS OPM Medical Retirement: Our Collective Responsibilities
    Posted on August 21, 2019

         Is it a redundancy to place “our” before the “collective”? Or, inasmuch as “our” can mean 2 or more individuals together, whereas “collective” might imply a more expansive spectrum of diffuse aggregation, that the second word “adds” something to the first? Do we even have such a thing, and what can it mean ... Read more

  • FERS OPM Medical Retirement: The Lie of Agnosticism
    Posted on August 20, 2019

         Bertrand Russell was famous for it (who would not be — of a tall, slender intellectual with a shock of white hair with that image of a long-stemmed pipe puffing with short bursts of tobacco smoke trailing pervasively behind between haltingly muttered sentences of profound logical confusions?); most of us are lulled into ... Read more

  • FERS OPM Medical Retirement: Deus ex Machina
    Posted on August 19, 2019

    It is a contrivance which finds its origins in Greek plays of a civilization now gone; of the recognition of unsolvable problems created by human hubris; and when all seems lost, the “machina” (machine) which lowers the god (the “Deus”) onto the stage then resolves everything by supernatural means. The contrivance itself would probably not ... Read more