FERS & CSRS Federal Disability Retirement from the Office of Personnel Management: The Interests of Each

In assessing and evaluating friends, adversaries or neutral parties, it is important to analyze the self-interest of each, to understand the differing perspectives of the people involved, then to arrive at conclusions concerning the benefits received in the interaction of the process.  In preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS from the Office of Personnel Management, the parties involved include:  The individual FERS or CSRS Federal or Postal employee who is contemplating initiating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits; the Agency (including coworkers, Supervisors, Managers, etc.) for whom the Federal or Postal worker is employed by; the Human Resources Department of the Agency (which is a separate and distinct entity from the "Agency" for whom the Federal or Postal worker is employed by, precisely because (A) they are often a separate section of the agency and (B) the personnel employees have had no day-to-day contact, for the most part, with the employee but (C) whether the Human Resources Department is "management-friendly" or "employee-driven", may color the perspective of where their alliances and loyalties lean); the U.S. Office of Personnel Management; the Attorney or Representative of the Federal or Postal employee assisting in the preparation, formulation and filing of a Federal Disability Retirement application.  Obviously, the first and the last (the potential Federal or Postal employee/applicant for Federal Disability Retirement benefits) and his or her attorney, should have a contiguous perspective:  to look out for the best interests of the Federal or Postal employee who is filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS.  The "others" — no matter how friendly, by all appearances "helpful", and no matter how much assistance is provided —  have their own self-interests to protect, preserve and advance.  Keep the different perspectives in mind.  Better yet, understand that self-interest is the primary motivating factor of Agencies — and act in the interest of one’s own advancement accordingly.

Sincerely, Robert R. McGill, Esquire 

In assessing and evaluating friends, adversaries or neutral parties, it is important to analyze the self-interest of each, to understand the differing perspectives of the people involved, then to arrive at conclusions concerning the benefits

View Attorney Profile

Robert R. McGill

Licensed since 1988

Member at firm Robert R. McGill

AWARDS

Champion Badge Platinum

RECENT POSTS

  • FERS OPM Disability Retirement: Similar Lives
    Posted on October 16, 2019
    Topic: Administrative Law

        Dissimilarity is what threatens us; similarity — the notion that there are shared, common characteristics between you and I — provides for an acceptable level of comfort and security. When we learn about the lives of the “rich and famous”, other than feeling some sense of envy, we can still imagine enough similarity ... Read more

  • FERS OPM Disability Retirement: The Albatross
    Posted on October 15, 2019
    Topic: Administrative Law

         The reference is likely outdated. One doesn’t hear of the phrase, anymore, that “X is like an albatross around my neck.” If it is referenced at all, one is likely to witness everyone standing around within earshot to whip out their smartphones and Google it, to find: Literally a large sea bird. The ... Read more

  • FERS OPM Disability Retirement: What we Seek
    Posted on October 14, 2019
    Topic: Administrative Law

         Can everyone’s desire be placed under a single rubric, a single conceptual umbrella which captures the essence of human want? Is it happiness we all seek? A sense of security, or perhaps of joy, contentment, peace or love? And if we were to all agree concerning the single most important goal for which ... Read more

Robert R. McGill

Licensed since 1988

Member at firm Robert R. McGill

AWARDS

Champion Badge Platinum

RECENT POSTS

  • FERS OPM Disability Retirement: Similar Lives
    Posted on October 16, 2019
    Topic: Administrative Law

        Dissimilarity is what threatens us; similarity — the notion that there are shared, common characteristics between you and I — provides for an acceptable level of comfort and security. When we learn about the lives of the “rich and famous”, other than feeling some sense of envy, we can still imagine enough similarity ... Read more

  • FERS OPM Disability Retirement: The Albatross
    Posted on October 15, 2019
    Topic: Administrative Law

         The reference is likely outdated. One doesn’t hear of the phrase, anymore, that “X is like an albatross around my neck.” If it is referenced at all, one is likely to witness everyone standing around within earshot to whip out their smartphones and Google it, to find: Literally a large sea bird. The ... Read more

  • FERS OPM Disability Retirement: What we Seek
    Posted on October 14, 2019
    Topic: Administrative Law

         Can everyone’s desire be placed under a single rubric, a single conceptual umbrella which captures the essence of human want? Is it happiness we all seek? A sense of security, or perhaps of joy, contentment, peace or love? And if we were to all agree concerning the single most important goal for which ... Read more