FERS & CSRS Federal Disability Retirement from the Office of Personnel Management: The Proper Balance

Meeting and arriving at the "proper balance" in any endeavor is an Aristotelian concept found in his Nichomachean Ethics, of achieving a median between any two extremes.  In preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS, it is important to ascertain, then apply, this concept of a "middle" balance between providing too much information (which then includes much superfluous content and documentation which merely provides volume, but not qualitative evidence of one’s Federal Disability Retirement eligibility), and not enough to meet the legal criteria.  By appearance alone (and here, of course, the philosophical outlook and distinction between that which is merely "appearance" as opposed to "substance" applies beautifully), it is sometimes necessary to provide a certain level of volume of medical records in order to satisfy OPM that there is indeed "substance" to one’s medical claim.  It is an unfortunate anomaly that, while on the one hand OPM is looking for "relevant" information, and much of the office and treatment notes of a doctor merely contain passing and quick notations on treatment modalities, medication regimens prescribed, etc.; nevertheless, the appearance of office notes, regardless of their irrelevant nature and lack of substantive content, accompanying a qualitatively significant medical narrative report, often satisfies OPM’s request for "documentation" of a medical condition.  On the other hand, too great a volume of immaterial medical documentation which tends to show nothing, should be streamlined, if possible.  Meeting that Aristotelian "median" between providing too much and too little is something which is discretionary, but important to attain.  It is normally through experience of having handled a volume of cases that one can gain a sense of what the "proper balance" means, but for the particular Federal or Postal employee who is preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, such an endeavor is, and should be, the one and only time that such an encounter would be engaged in. That, in and of itself, is a conundrum which can only be resolved by consulting someone who is knowledgeable in the area of Federal Disability Retirement law, and as knowledge of first principles is also an Aristotelian mandate, so consultation with those who are familiar with such first principles (or any principle which applies to OPM’s arbitrary approach, for that matter) should be a must for the Federal or Postal employee considering a Federal Disability Retirement application.

Sincerely, Robert R. McGill, Esquire

Meeting and arriving at the "proper balance" in any endeavor is an Aristotelian concept found in his Nichomachean Ethics, of achieving a median between any two extremes.  In preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits

View Attorney Profile

Robert R. McGill

Licensed since 1988

Member at firm Robert R. McGill

AWARDS

Champion Badge Platinum

RECENT POSTS

  • FERS OPM Disability Retirement: Similar Lives
    Posted on October 16, 2019
    Topic: Administrative Law

        Dissimilarity is what threatens us; similarity — the notion that there are shared, common characteristics between you and I — provides for an acceptable level of comfort and security. When we learn about the lives of the “rich and famous”, other than feeling some sense of envy, we can still imagine enough similarity ... Read more

  • FERS OPM Disability Retirement: The Albatross
    Posted on October 15, 2019
    Topic: Administrative Law

         The reference is likely outdated. One doesn’t hear of the phrase, anymore, that “X is like an albatross around my neck.” If it is referenced at all, one is likely to witness everyone standing around within earshot to whip out their smartphones and Google it, to find: Literally a large sea bird. The ... Read more

  • FERS OPM Disability Retirement: What we Seek
    Posted on October 14, 2019
    Topic: Administrative Law

         Can everyone’s desire be placed under a single rubric, a single conceptual umbrella which captures the essence of human want? Is it happiness we all seek? A sense of security, or perhaps of joy, contentment, peace or love? And if we were to all agree concerning the single most important goal for which ... Read more

Robert R. McGill

Licensed since 1988

Member at firm Robert R. McGill

AWARDS

Champion Badge Platinum

RECENT POSTS

  • FERS OPM Disability Retirement: Similar Lives
    Posted on October 16, 2019
    Topic: Administrative Law

        Dissimilarity is what threatens us; similarity — the notion that there are shared, common characteristics between you and I — provides for an acceptable level of comfort and security. When we learn about the lives of the “rich and famous”, other than feeling some sense of envy, we can still imagine enough similarity ... Read more

  • FERS OPM Disability Retirement: The Albatross
    Posted on October 15, 2019
    Topic: Administrative Law

         The reference is likely outdated. One doesn’t hear of the phrase, anymore, that “X is like an albatross around my neck.” If it is referenced at all, one is likely to witness everyone standing around within earshot to whip out their smartphones and Google it, to find: Literally a large sea bird. The ... Read more

  • FERS OPM Disability Retirement: What we Seek
    Posted on October 14, 2019
    Topic: Administrative Law

         Can everyone’s desire be placed under a single rubric, a single conceptual umbrella which captures the essence of human want? Is it happiness we all seek? A sense of security, or perhaps of joy, contentment, peace or love? And if we were to all agree concerning the single most important goal for which ... Read more