FERS OPM Medical Retirement: Ballast for the soul - Administrative Law Legal Blogs Posted by Robert R. McGill - Lawyers.com

FERS OPM Medical Retirement: Ballast for the soul

     It is a plagiarized phrase, from a short story written by Brazil’s (often-considered) greatest writer, Machado De Assis (forgive the ignorance of one who is unfamiliar with foreign names, whether the “D” in “De” should be capitalized or not). It is that heavy material, where a large quantity of gravel, iron, metals, etc., placed low in a vessel in order to provide stability; the weight itself is what “grounds” the vessel so that the torrents of waves and storms of fury will not topple it. Or, it can refer to the coarse gravel used in order to set railroad tracks, again allowing for stability of a foundation to prevent shifting, sinking or damaging movement. When combined with the term, “the soul”, the concept created is one of conjoining the dual ideas of (a) providing a foundation with (b) an ungraspable concept of an entity that many believe does not even exist. The “soul”, of course, is a controversial subject; for, it still remains from the vestiges of religious and philosophical discourses, and refers to an abiding entity that defies mortality, retains an identity beyond one’s physical appearance, and contains the essence of who a person is, whether in physical form or not. Does the soul “need” a ballast? Without it, does it merely flit about without duration or direction? As a literary concept, it refers to the stability that individuals need in order to become more serious, more focused, and perhaps even more “mature”. As a general idea, it comes to convey the concept of pragmatism and the need to be “grounded” in a universe where there exists so many beliefs, so many paths to get off course; and the dangers inherent in pulling people aside from living an authentic and fulfilling life are many, as evidenced by the number of wandering souls left to rot on the roadside of discarded souls. What is the ballast for the soul? Is it to be married and have a family? Is it the immediate family one already has — or the extended one? Or can a cadre of friends and one’s immediate neighbors provide the ballast for the soul? For each individual, the answer to that question may differ and remain a mystery; but what is clear, mystery or not, is that the vicissitudes of life’s choices, without a ballast for the soul, are so numerous and of such great variety, that liberty of endless choices endangers the essence of every person. Health itself can be an unknown ballast; for, with it, we take for granted our ability to accomplish so many things in life; without it — when it is “lost” — we suddenly realize that the ballast of health can upend that which we took for granted — career; stability; sense of worth; sense of self. For Federal employees and U.S. Postal workers whose ballast has been lost because of a medical condition, it may be time to prepare, formulate and file for Federal Disability Retirement benefits through the U.S. Office of Personnel Management. Medical conditions are often the storms of life which topple the vessel once the foundation of stability has been robbed, and Federal Disability Retirement benefits can restore one’s sense of security such that a re-focusing upon the priority of health and well-being can be attained, so that the ballast for the soul can be reestablished in a world full of turmoil and tumult.
Sincerely, Robert R. McGill, Esquire

View Attorney Profile

Robert R. McGill

Licensed since 1988

Member at firm Robert R. McGill

AWARDS

Champion Badge Platinum

RECENT POSTS

  • FERS OPM Disability Retirement: The Before & After
    Posted on August 24, 2019

         In once sense, there can always be the identifiable spectrum bifurcated into the “before” and “after”, and the conditions, the context and the significant differences characterized by each. There is the time “before” the 1929 stock market crash, and then the “after”. There is the “before” period in Nazi Germany, and the “after” ... Read more

  • FERS OPM Disability Retirement: Those Glazed Eyes
    Posted on August 23, 2019

         We all engage in the act; of sitting or standing but not seeing beyond the bridge of our nose; of being lost in thought, perhaps in a daydream, or for a particularly difficult project that one is focused upon. We even do it while driving, and when we arrive at our destination, we ... Read more

  • FERS OPM Disability Retirement: A Thousand Cuts
    Posted on August 22, 2019

         It is the classic question which allegedly reveals something about a person’s inner psyche: Of whether you would rather die from a thousand cuts, or quickly and instantaneously? Of course, the third option is never allowed within the hypothetical, because to include it would defeat the whole purpose of the question: Of continuing ... Read more

Robert R. McGill

Licensed since 1988

Member at firm Robert R. McGill

AWARDS

Champion Badge Platinum

RECENT POSTS

  • FERS OPM Disability Retirement: The Before & After
    Posted on August 24, 2019

         In once sense, there can always be the identifiable spectrum bifurcated into the “before” and “after”, and the conditions, the context and the significant differences characterized by each. There is the time “before” the 1929 stock market crash, and then the “after”. There is the “before” period in Nazi Germany, and the “after” ... Read more

  • FERS OPM Disability Retirement: Those Glazed Eyes
    Posted on August 23, 2019

         We all engage in the act; of sitting or standing but not seeing beyond the bridge of our nose; of being lost in thought, perhaps in a daydream, or for a particularly difficult project that one is focused upon. We even do it while driving, and when we arrive at our destination, we ... Read more

  • FERS OPM Disability Retirement: A Thousand Cuts
    Posted on August 22, 2019

         It is the classic question which allegedly reveals something about a person’s inner psyche: Of whether you would rather die from a thousand cuts, or quickly and instantaneously? Of course, the third option is never allowed within the hypothetical, because to include it would defeat the whole purpose of the question: Of continuing ... Read more