Posted on February 04, 2015 in Administrative Law
There is a reason why mistakes have a historical backdrop of repetition; as wisdom gained is neither venerated nor preserved, and as youth and folly are celebrated despite lack of accomplishment, so the latter fails to consult the former. The discontinuity of wisdom in modernity reflects an arrogance of carelessness. Opinions from elders are neither sought after nor consulted; "new" represents innovation, and that which constituted the radical changes of yesteryear reflect merely the boredom of todays vigor. But reinventing the wheel at every turn is a kind of folly which borders upon insanity. It is the reality of encountering a bureaucracy which often makes aware one’s need to consult prior experiences. And, indeed, for Federal and Postal employees who must engage a Federal bureaucracy such as the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, it is a wise thing to do, to consult with an attorney who has already encountered the administrative process of filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits, whether the Federal employee or the U.S. Postal worker is under FERS, CSRS or CSRS Offset. There is rarely a need to make nascent mistakes where experience has otherwise provided an answer. Preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits by a Federal or Postal worker is a difficult process in and of itself, and the bureaucratic process exponentially magnifies the conundrums and roadblocks presented by the complexities of the administrative procedures. While society itself will eschew the wisdom of ages, within the microcosm if everyday life, it is often a good idea to consult with an experienced advisor, if only to find out where the darned bathroom is.
Sincerely, Robert R. McGill, Esquire