Attorney fees not allowed for negligent home construction - Civil Litigation Legal Blogs Posted by John J. Tollefsen - Lawyers.com

Attorney fees not allowed for negligent home construction

Haynes v. Adair Homes, Inc., — P.3d —-, 2009 WL 1067509(Or.App. Apr 22, 2009) (NO. CCV0211573, A129305)

Purchasers of home asserted successful negligence claims on behalf of their children for health complications resulting from mold and water damage in the home. The trial court awarded attorney fees to children under terms of parent’s contract. The Court of Appeals reversed because the children were not parties to the contract.

View Attorney Profile

John J. Tollefsen

Licensed since 1974

Member at firm Tollefsen Law PLLC

AWARDS

AV Preeminent

RECENT POSTS

  • Fraudulent Conveyance – No Intent Required
    Posted on November 5, 2009

    Under Washington’s Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA), chapter 19.40 RCW, creditors have a cause of action against transferees who received fraudulently conveyed property of debtors. Division III added (“read in”) the requirement that there be intent to defraud. The UFTA statute does not require intent. ... Read more

  • Negligent Misrepresentation Rescission Claim Allowed
    Posted on November 5, 2009

    Washington’s Supreme Court extended the rule to cover all cases where the harm is “more properly remediable only in contract” in Alejandre v. Bull, 159 Wash.2d 674, 153 P.3d 864 (2007). The Court then put the legal world on notice that there will be certain exceptions like, maybe, professional malpractice. The reasoning is fuzzy. In ... Read more

  • Rulings apply retroactively unless the case states the application is prospective only
    Posted on August 31, 2009
    Topic: Litigation

    When the Supreme Court announces a new rule of law or a change of existing law, the issues becomes whether it is applied to cases that arose prior to the ruling. The answer is that it depends on whether the court holds that it is prospective or retroactive. In explaining its ruling the court made ... Read more

John J. Tollefsen

Licensed since 1974

Member at firm Tollefsen Law PLLC

AWARDS

AV Preeminent

RECENT POSTS

  • Fraudulent Conveyance – No Intent Required
    Posted on November 5, 2009

    Under Washington’s Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (UFTA), chapter 19.40 RCW, creditors have a cause of action against transferees who received fraudulently conveyed property of debtors. Division III added (“read in”) the requirement that there be intent to defraud. The UFTA statute does not require intent. ... Read more

  • Negligent Misrepresentation Rescission Claim Allowed
    Posted on November 5, 2009

    Washington’s Supreme Court extended the rule to cover all cases where the harm is “more properly remediable only in contract” in Alejandre v. Bull, 159 Wash.2d 674, 153 P.3d 864 (2007). The Court then put the legal world on notice that there will be certain exceptions like, maybe, professional malpractice. The reasoning is fuzzy. In ... Read more

  • Rulings apply retroactively unless the case states the application is prospective only
    Posted on August 31, 2009
    Topic: Litigation

    When the Supreme Court announces a new rule of law or a change of existing law, the issues becomes whether it is applied to cases that arose prior to the ruling. The answer is that it depends on whether the court holds that it is prospective or retroactive. In explaining its ruling the court made ... Read more