Corporations Really Do Need a License

Often we write these blogs to inform readers about new statutes,
regulations, or legal cases that might affect your company. But there
are other times we see the need to remind construction industry
professionals (or inform those new to the industry) about fundamental
rules that many of us take for granted.

License Rule Not Just for Individuals

For example, most people know that the party promising to do the work
in a construction contract of $500 or more must be a licensed
contractor. Unfortunately, there appears to be some confusion when
corporations are involved. If a corporation enters into a construction
contract, that corporation must be licensed. It is not enough for a shareholder, officer, or employee to have an individual license.

The primary penalty is that an unlicensed contractor cannot sue to
recover unpaid fees. So although a highly skilled employee of the
corporation who holds an individual license may be doing or supervising
the work on a construction project, because the corporation itself is
not licensed, the California Business and Professions Code prohibits the
corporation from suing to recover moneys owed to it. To make matters
worse, the other party to the contract can sue for disgorgement of
moneys paid to the unlicensed contractor.

No Protection from a DBA

Recently we have seen situations in which licensed individuals with
DBAs (“doing business as”) form corporations with the same names as the
DBAs and then enter into construction projects under those corporation
names. That practice would be fine as long as those corporations also
became licensed with the California Contractors State License Board
(CSLB) before entering into the contracts.

Chose the Right Qualifier

As per the CSLB, to be licensed, a corporation must have a qualifying individual or “qualifier” who:

  • Is listed in CSLB’s personnel of record [sole owner, qualifying
    partner, responsible managing employee (RME), responsible managing
    officer (RMO), responsible managing manager, or responsible managing
    member].
  • Has demonstrated his or her knowledge and experience through the
    application process, and holds one or more license classification.
  • Exercises direct supervision and control of construction operations.

These steps must occur or the corporation has no rights, and the licensed individual’s rights are difficult to predict.

The bottom line is that to protect your corporation and its right to
be paid, you must make sure your corporation is appropriately licensed!

View Attorney Profile

James R. Wakefield, P.C.

Licensed since 1981

Member at firm Cummins & White, LLP

AWARDS

AV Preeminent

RECENT POSTS

  • Disadvantaged Business Enterprises: Potential Opportunities or Disasters
    Posted on July 28, 2016
    Topic: Construction Law Construction Litigation

    The certified “Disadvantaged Business Enterprise” (DBE) is an integral part of the construction industry in California and nationwide. Billions of dollars in construction funds are allocated solely to DBEs in California every year. The DBE program is a creation of the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) and other federal agencies. If DOT funds are used ... Read more

  • A Refresher on “Prelims” — Part 3 The Challenge of “Substantial Accuracy”
    Posted on July 19, 2016
    Topic: Construction Law

    In this final post about Preliminary Notices, we will address a question that often arises when completing the required information: What should a contractor or material supplier do if the price listed on its Preliminary Notice turns out to be much lower than the actual cost of the work? What is Substantial Accuracy? Prior to ... Read more

  • A Refresher on “Prelims” — Part 2 Where Does a Notice of Nonresponsibility Fit In?
    Posted on June 30, 2016
    Topic: Construction Law

    Yes, serving a valid and timely Preliminary Notice to the correct individuals is the single most important thing a competent materials supplier or subcontractor can do to protect its investment in labor and materials. But what if one of the correct individuals rejects your Preliminary Notice and denies responsibility for the project? Oftentimes tenants construct ... Read more

James R. Wakefield, P.C.

Licensed since 1981

Member at firm Cummins & White, LLP

AWARDS

AV Preeminent

RECENT POSTS

  • Disadvantaged Business Enterprises: Potential Opportunities or Disasters
    Posted on July 28, 2016
    Topic: Construction Law Construction Litigation

    The certified “Disadvantaged Business Enterprise” (DBE) is an integral part of the construction industry in California and nationwide. Billions of dollars in construction funds are allocated solely to DBEs in California every year. The DBE program is a creation of the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) and other federal agencies. If DOT funds are used ... Read more

  • A Refresher on “Prelims” — Part 3 The Challenge of “Substantial Accuracy”
    Posted on July 19, 2016
    Topic: Construction Law

    In this final post about Preliminary Notices, we will address a question that often arises when completing the required information: What should a contractor or material supplier do if the price listed on its Preliminary Notice turns out to be much lower than the actual cost of the work? What is Substantial Accuracy? Prior to ... Read more

  • A Refresher on “Prelims” — Part 2 Where Does a Notice of Nonresponsibility Fit In?
    Posted on June 30, 2016
    Topic: Construction Law

    Yes, serving a valid and timely Preliminary Notice to the correct individuals is the single most important thing a competent materials supplier or subcontractor can do to protect its investment in labor and materials. But what if one of the correct individuals rejects your Preliminary Notice and denies responsibility for the project? Oftentimes tenants construct ... Read more