Guidance on Checking Veracity of Form I-551 without Violating Anti-discrimination Laws

The Office of Special Counsel (OSC) for the Department of Justice (DOJ) provided a Technical Assistance Letter (TAL)[1] to an immigration attorney who requested an advisory opinion on how her client should seek to comply with the requirements of section 274a of the INA (relating to not employing aliens who lack employment authorization) without violating 274b (prohibitions on discriminatory conduct in employment-related matters). The attorney sought guidance on how her client should proceed after an internal audit of its employees’ Forms I-9 called into doubt the veracity of some of the employees’ Forms I-551. The attorney was concerned that if her client requested alternative documentation from the employees in question, it would open itself up to a lawsuit under 274b. Her concerns were exacerbated by the fact that the employees in question shared a common national origin.
The TAL provided general advice for employers in similar situations. It listed the types of discriminatory employment-related conduct that are prohibited under 274b:
  1. citizenship or immigration status discrimination;
  2. national origin discrimination;
  3. unfair documentary practices during the employment eligibility verification (Form I-9 and E-Verify process) ("document abuse"); and
  4. retaliation for filing a charge, assisting in an investigation, or asserting rights under the anti-discrimination provision.
The TAL then included general advice for complying with 274a without violating 274b:
  • Internal Form I-9 audits should treat similarly-situated employees in a similar manner and should not treat employees differently based on citizenship status or national origin.
  • The same level of scrutiny should be applied to all Forms I-9 without regard to citizenship or national origin.
  • Provided that the employer conducts the Form I-9 audit and the review in a consistent manner, requesting alternative documentation from certain employees whose documentation was found to be questionable is unlikely to violate 274b.
The TAL provides solid general advice to employers in similar situations. An employer with questions relating to 274a and 274b should always consult with an experienced immigration attorney.
Please visit the nyc immigration lawyers website for further information. The Law Offices of Grinberg & Segal, PLLC focuses vast segment of its practice on immigration law. This steadfast dedication has resulted in thousands of immigrants throughout the United States.
  1. Published on AILA InfoNet at Doc. No. 15110262
Lawyer website: http://myattorneyusa.com

The Office of Special Counsel (OSC) for the Department of Justice (DOJ) provided an interesting Technical Assistance Letter (TAL) to an immigration attorney who requested an advisory opinion on how her client should seek to comply with the requirements of section 274a of the INA (relating to not employing aliens who lack employment authorization) without violating 274b (prohibitions on discriminatory conduct in employment-related matters).

View Attorney Profile

RECENT POSTS

  • Strong Support For Israel’s Right To Defend Itself From DOS And DOD
    Posted on February 21, 2018
    Topic: Immigration

    Readers of the blog will know that I occasionally take the time to comment on significant events in Israel and in U.S.-Israel relations, two subjects that I am passionate about. For example, please see my posts praising President Donald Trump’s decision to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel [see blog] and on the 50th ... Read more

  • Israeli Judoka Tal Flicker Triumphs Over Discrimination In Abu Dhabi Judo..
    Posted on February 14, 2018
    Topic: Immigration

    From October 26 to 28, the “Abu Dhabi Judo Grand Slam” took place in the city of Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The UAE, like the majority of Muslim-majority countries in the region, has no diplomatic relations with Israel and is outright hostile toward the Jewish people. Unsurprisingly, and despite warnings from ... Read more

  • Natalia Veselnitskaya Denied Parole For Hearing In Prevezon Case
    Posted on February 13, 2018
    Topic: Immigration

    An interesting case arose recently involving the denial of immigration parole for a prominent Russian lawyer seeking to represent a client in litigation in the United States. On November 3, 2017, Judge William H. Pauley III of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a memorandum and order in ... Read more

RECENT POSTS

  • Strong Support For Israel’s Right To Defend Itself From DOS And DOD
    Posted on February 21, 2018
    Topic: Immigration

    Readers of the blog will know that I occasionally take the time to comment on significant events in Israel and in U.S.-Israel relations, two subjects that I am passionate about. For example, please see my posts praising President Donald Trump’s decision to recognize Jerusalem as the capital of Israel [see blog] and on the 50th ... Read more

  • Israeli Judoka Tal Flicker Triumphs Over Discrimination In Abu Dhabi Judo..
    Posted on February 14, 2018
    Topic: Immigration

    From October 26 to 28, the “Abu Dhabi Judo Grand Slam” took place in the city of Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The UAE, like the majority of Muslim-majority countries in the region, has no diplomatic relations with Israel and is outright hostile toward the Jewish people. Unsurprisingly, and despite warnings from ... Read more

  • Natalia Veselnitskaya Denied Parole For Hearing In Prevezon Case
    Posted on February 13, 2018
    Topic: Immigration

    An interesting case arose recently involving the denial of immigration parole for a prominent Russian lawyer seeking to represent a client in litigation in the United States. On November 3, 2017, Judge William H. Pauley III of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a memorandum and order in ... Read more