Is California Considered a No-Fault State? - Personal Injury Legal Blogs Posted by Steven Orin Teal - Lawyers.com

Is California Considered a No-Fault State?

California is considered a fault or tort state with regard to auto accidents. In California, a person must be found to be responsible for causing the accident before that person’s insurance will pay for damages. This is in contrast to the no-fault states, such as Florida and New Jersey, where there is no requirement to prove fault and the injured person collects from his own insurance company for medical costs and lost wages; the injured party cannot sue the party at fault for additional monies unless the state allows for special circumstances. The state in which the accident occurred will govern the case. Therefore, it is important to contact an attorney who knows accident law and can help you understand your rights.

California is a tort state which requires that a party must prove fault before there is legal liability. With regard to auto accidents, this means that the injured party must show that the other party negligently caused the accident. California follows the pure comparative negligence law. This allocates fault between parties and will reduce any recovery accordingly. For example, if damages in a case are $10,000 and you are considered 80% at fault, you can still recover damages for the remaining 20% or $2,000. Each party’s negligence is compared to the others and damages are awarded according to percentage of fault.

California cases involving fault issues are often complicated. That is when you need an attorney experienced in handling auto accidents and comparative negligence matters. Our Sacramento car accident attorneys at Teal Montgomery & Henderson have that experience in California’s auto accident law, and can be reached at 866-878-5267 for more information or to set up an intial consultation.

The Sacramento auto accident law firm Teal Montgomery & Henderson discusses California fault law and its legal consequences.

View Attorney Profile

Steven Orin Teal

Licensed since 1973

Member at firm Teal Montgomery & Henderson

AWARDS

BV Distinguished

RECENT POSTS

  • Who is at Fault when Determining Motorcycle Accident Liability
    Posted on September 29, 2009

    Individuals who have suffered a motorcycle accident in California due to the negligence of another party are entitled to sue for damages. These damages may include property damages, physical injury, emotional injury, lost wages and more. In determining compensation levels, the liability of the accused party must be determined.  However, determining who is at fault ... Read more

  • Evaluating Potential Medical Malpractice Cases
    Posted on March 4, 2009

    @font-face { font-family: Verdana; } @page Section1 {size: 8.5in 11.0in; margin: 1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; } P.MsoNormal { FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: “Times New Roman” } LI.MsoNormal { FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: “Times New Roman” } DIV.MsoNormal { FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: “Times New Roman” } ... Read more

  • How to Prove Your Medical Malpractice Case
    Posted on June 23, 2008

    There are a few things you should consider to establish a case for medical malpractice.  The plaintiff must prove that: The defendant had a duty to the plaintiff. The defendant failed to meet the standard of care owed to the plaintiff. The mistake actually caused the plaintiff’s injury. The doctor or other medical professional’s negligence ... Read more

Steven Orin Teal

Licensed since 1973

Member at firm Teal Montgomery & Henderson

AWARDS

BV Distinguished

RECENT POSTS

  • Who is at Fault when Determining Motorcycle Accident Liability
    Posted on September 29, 2009

    Individuals who have suffered a motorcycle accident in California due to the negligence of another party are entitled to sue for damages. These damages may include property damages, physical injury, emotional injury, lost wages and more. In determining compensation levels, the liability of the accused party must be determined.  However, determining who is at fault ... Read more

  • Evaluating Potential Medical Malpractice Cases
    Posted on March 4, 2009

    @font-face { font-family: Verdana; } @page Section1 {size: 8.5in 11.0in; margin: 1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; } P.MsoNormal { FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: “Times New Roman” } LI.MsoNormal { FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: “Times New Roman” } DIV.MsoNormal { FONT-SIZE: 12pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: “Times New Roman” } ... Read more

  • How to Prove Your Medical Malpractice Case
    Posted on June 23, 2008

    There are a few things you should consider to establish a case for medical malpractice.  The plaintiff must prove that: The defendant had a duty to the plaintiff. The defendant failed to meet the standard of care owed to the plaintiff. The mistake actually caused the plaintiff’s injury. The doctor or other medical professional’s negligence ... Read more