Of Personal Injury Law, Bricks and Baseball - Personal Injury Legal Blogs Posted by Robert I. Feinberg - Lawyers.com

Of Personal Injury Law, Bricks and Baseball

Proving responsibility in personal injury cases can be reduced to the following: a brick by itself is a brick but together bricks make a wall.  Essentially that is the definition of relevant evidence.

Relevant evidence, according to the Federal Rules of Evidence, means that it has a tendency to make any fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence.  Each state, including Massachusetts where I practice, follows that definition.

The above reference to bricks is contained in the Advisory Committee’s Note to Federal Rule of Evidence 401.  The Congress, the drafters of the Federal Rules, use another analogy, one close to baseball-mad Boston.  “It is not supposed that every witness can make a home run.” 

I might have said it differently.  I would have used “hit” a home run instead of “make” a home run.  Then again, as my father who founded our law firm used to say, “Let’s get a hit!”  Yes, not every witness can hit a home run but make sure the witness can get a base hit. 


Feinberg & Alban, P.C.
141 Tremont Street, Boston MA 02111

As a Boston personal injury lawyer, proving responsibility in personal injury cases can be reduced to the following: a brick by itself is a brick but together bricks make a wall.  Essentially that is the definition of relevant evidence.

Relevant evidence, according to the Federal Rules of Evidence, means

View Attorney Profile

Robert I. Feinberg

Licensed since 1982

Member at firm Feinberg & Alban, P.C.

AWARDS

AV Preeminent

RECENT POSTS

  • Statements of Intent
    Posted on December 5, 2012

    In Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Hillmon, the Supreme Court rendered a famous and controversial judgement concerning the admissibility of a person’s out-of-court statement. Rule 803(3) of the Federal Rules of Evidence deals with the famous Hillmon case, but it restricts its applicability. In Hillmon, the U.S. Supreme Court allowed evidence of person A’s statement ... Read more

  • Jury Impanelment (Cont.)
    Posted on November 28, 2012
    Topic: Litigation

    Most trial attorneys and judges will tell you that you can never predict the way that jurors will interpret a case.  Further, because the secrecy of jury deliberations is so closely guarded, none of us can really know what specifically influenced the jurors.  The judges talk to the jurors after the verdict in the jury ... Read more

  • Civil Litigators… In the Beginning
    Posted on November 20, 2012

    Having employed law students and new lawyers for almost thirty years, I find their perceptions worth sharing for what it says about the practice of law as opposed to their expectations. At the outset, let me point out that these are talented and earnest people.  In general, civil litigation is not what they expected after ... Read more

Robert I. Feinberg

Licensed since 1982

Member at firm Feinberg & Alban, P.C.

AWARDS

AV Preeminent

RECENT POSTS

  • Statements of Intent
    Posted on December 5, 2012

    In Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Hillmon, the Supreme Court rendered a famous and controversial judgement concerning the admissibility of a person’s out-of-court statement. Rule 803(3) of the Federal Rules of Evidence deals with the famous Hillmon case, but it restricts its applicability. In Hillmon, the U.S. Supreme Court allowed evidence of person A’s statement ... Read more

  • Jury Impanelment (Cont.)
    Posted on November 28, 2012
    Topic: Litigation

    Most trial attorneys and judges will tell you that you can never predict the way that jurors will interpret a case.  Further, because the secrecy of jury deliberations is so closely guarded, none of us can really know what specifically influenced the jurors.  The judges talk to the jurors after the verdict in the jury ... Read more

  • Civil Litigators… In the Beginning
    Posted on November 20, 2012

    Having employed law students and new lawyers for almost thirty years, I find their perceptions worth sharing for what it says about the practice of law as opposed to their expectations. At the outset, let me point out that these are talented and earnest people.  In general, civil litigation is not what they expected after ... Read more